International Emergency Nursing
Volume 16, Issue 2 , Pages 109-118 , April 2008

Acute coronary syndromes focusing on left bundle branch block

  • Cliff Evans, BSc, RGN (Senior Nurse)

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +44 7736646683.
  • ,
  • Emma Tippins, MSc, RGN (Matron Emergency Care)

Received 22 August 2007 ,Revised 20 January 2008 ,Accepted 4 February 2008.

References 

  1. American Heart Association . Heart disease and stroke statistics-2006 update: a report from the american heart association statistics committee and stroke statistics subcommittee. Circulation. 2006;113:85–151
  2. Baldasseroni S, Opasich C, Gorini M. Left bundle-branch block is associated with increased 1-year sudden and total mortality rate in 5517 outpatients with congestive heart failure: a report from the Italian network on congestive heart failure. American Heart Journal. 2002;143:398–405
  3. Cleland JGF, Torabi A, Khan NK. Epidemiology and management of heart failure and left ventricular systolic dysfunction in the aftermath of a myocardial infarction. Heart. 2005;91:7–13
  4. Department of Health . National Service Framework For Coronary Heart Disease. London: DoH; 2000;Crown Copyright
  5. Department of Health . Reforming Emergency Care. London: DoH; 2001;Crown Copyright
  6. Edhouse J, Brady W, Morris F. Acute myocardial infarction – Part II. British Medical Journal. 2002;324:963–966
  7. Evans C, Tippins E. The Foundations of Emergency Care. Maidenhead: Open University Press; 2007;
  8. Horenstein, S.M., 2005. Atrioventricular Block, Third Degree, Acquired. Emedicine.com. emedicine.com/ped/topic2495.htm (Last accessed April 15th 2005).
  9. Kontos M, McQueen R, Jesse R, Tatum J, Ornato J. Can myocardial infarction be rapidly identified in emergency department patients who have left bundle-branch block?. Annual of Emergency Medicine. 2001;37(5):431–438
  10. MINAP, 2004. How Hospitals Manage Heart Attacks. Third Public Report of the Myocardial Infarction National Audit Project. Clinical Effectiveness and Evaluation Unit. Royal College if Physicians, London.
  11. National Audit Office, 2005. Improving emergency care in England. Report by the controller and auditor general. NAO, London.
  12. Pope JH, Ruthazer R, Kontos MC, Beshansky JR, Griffith JL, Selker HP. The impact of electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy and bundle branch block on the triage and outcome of ED patients with a suspected acute coronary syndrome: a multicenter study. American Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2004;22(3):156–163
  13. Plunkett A, Hulse JA, Mishra B, Gill J. Variable presentation of Brugada syndrome: lessons from three generations with syncope. British Medical Journal. 2003;326:1078–1079
  14. Sgarbossa EB, Pinski SL, Barbagelata A, et al. Electrical diagnosis of evolving myocardial infarction in the presence of left bundle branch block. New England Journal of Medicine. 1996;334:481–487
  15. Resuscitation Council (UK) . Advanced Life Support. fifth ed.. London: RC (UK); 2006;
  16. Reuben AD, Mann CJ. Simplifying thrombolysis decisions in patients with left bundle branch block. Emergency Medical Journal. 2005;22:617–620
  17. Terkelsen J, Lassen FJ, Norgaard LB, et al. Mortality rates in patients with ST-elevation vs. non-ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction: observations from unselected cohort. European Heart Journal. 2005;26:18–26
  18. The Task Force for Percutaneous Coronary Interventions of the European Society of Cardiology . Guidelines for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. European Heart Journal. 2005;26:804–847
  19. Vernooy K, Verbeek X, Peschar M, et al. Left bundle branch block induces ventricular remodelling and functional septal hypoperfusion. European Heart Journal. 2005;26:91–98

PII: S1755-599X(08)00023-2

doi: 10.1016/j.ienj.2008.02.003

International Emergency Nursing
Volume 16, Issue 2 , Pages 109-118 , April 2008