Manchester Triage in Sweden – Interrater reliability and accuracy

References 

1. Altman DG. Practical Statistics for Medical Research. London: Chapman & Hall; 1999;
2. Baldursdottir MS, Jonsdottir H. The importance of nurse caring behaviours as perceived by patients receiving care at an emergency department. Hart and Lung. 2002;31:67–75
3. Beveridge R, Clarke B, Janes L, Savage N, Thompson J, Dodd G. Implementation Guidelines for the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS). Ottawa: CAEP; 1998;
4. Beveridge R, Ducharme J, Janes L, Beaulieu S, Walter S. Reliability of the Canadian emergency department triage and acuity scale: interrater agreement. Annals of Emergency Medicine. 1999;34:155–159
   • Abstract
   • Full Text
   • Full-Text PDF (63 KB)
   • CrossRef
5. Cohen J. Weighted kappa: nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychological Bulletin. 1968;70:213–220
   • CrossRef
6. Considine J, Ung L, Thomas S. Triage nurses’ decisions using the national triage scale for Australian emergency departments. Accident and Emergency Nursing. 2000;8:201–209
   • Abstract
   • Full-Text PDF (123 KB)
   • CrossRef
7. Considine J, Le Vasseur SA, Villanueva E. The Australasian triage scale: examining emergency department nurses’ performance using computer and paper scenarios. Annals of Emergency Medicine. 2004;44:516–523
   • Abstract
   • Full Text
   • Full-Text PDF (122 KB)
   • CrossRef
8. Cooke MV, Jinks S. Does the Manchester triage system detect the critically ill?. Journal of Accident & Emergency Medicine. 1999;16:179–181
   • MEDLINE
9. Crellin DJ, Johnston L. Poor agreement in application of the Australasian triage scale. Contemporary Nurse. 2003;15:49–60
10. Dann E, Jackson R, Mackway-Jones K. Appropriate categorisation of mild pain at triage: a diagnostic study. Emergency Nurse. 2005;13:28–32
11. Dong SL, Bullard MJ, Meurer DP, Blitz S, Akhmetshin E, Ohinmaa A. Predictive validity of a computerizes emergency triage tool. Academic Emergency Medicine. 2007;14:16–21
12. Fernandes C, Tanabe P, Gilboy N, Johnson L, Mc Nair R, Rosenau A. Five-level triage: a report from the ACEP/ENA five-level triage task force. Journal of Emergency Nursing. 2005;31:39–50
13. Fleiss JL, Cohen J. The equivalence of weighted kappa and the intraclass correlation coefficient as measure of reliability. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 1973;33:613–619
14. Gilboy, N., Tanabe, P., Travers, D., Rosenau, A., Eitel, D., 2005. Emergency Severity Index, Version 4: Implementation Handbook. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville. Accessed 15.11.07 <http://www.ahrq.gov/research/esi/>.
15. Goodacre SW, Gilett M, Harris RD, Houlihan KPK. Consistency of retrospective triage decisions as a standardised instrument for audit. Journal of Accident & Emergency Medicine. 1999;16:322–324
    • MEDLINE
16. Göransson, K., 2006. Registered Nurse-led Emergency Department Triage: Organisation, Allocation of Acuity Ratings and Triage Decision Making. Dissertation, Hälsovetenskapliga Institutionen. Örebro universitet, Örebro.
17. Göransson K, Ehrenberg A, Marklund B, Ehnfors M. Accuracy and concordance of nurses in emergency department triage. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Science. 2005;19:432–438
    • MEDLINE
    • CrossRef
18. Grafstein E, Innes G, Westman J, Christenson J, Thorne A. Inter-rater reliability of a computerized presenting-complaint-linked triage system in an urban emergency department. Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2003;5:323–329
19. Jakobsson U, Westergren A. Statistical methods for assessing agreement for ordinal data. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Science. 2005;19:427–431
    • MEDLINE
    • CrossRef
20. Lipley N. The Manchester triage system is proving ideal for the emergency care system in Portugal. Emergency Nurse. 2005;13:5
21. In:  Mackway-Jones K editors. Emergency Triage. London: BMJ; 1997;
22. Manos D, Petrie DA, Beveridge RC, Walter S, Ducharme J. Inter-observer agreement using the Canadian emergency department triage and acuity scale. Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2002;4:16–22
23. McCallum Pardey TG. The clinical practice of department triage: Application of Australasian Triage Scale – an extended literature review. Part 1: Evolution of the ATS. Australasian Emergency Journal. 2006;9:155–162
24. Palmquist I, Lindell G. Emergency departments in Sweden – today and in the future. Vård i norden. 2000;20:28–31
25. Socialstyrelsen, 1994. Akut omhändertagande – Ett underlag för kompetensutveckling vid omhändertagande av akut sjuka och skadade. Rapport 6, Socialstyrelsen, Stockholm.
26. Stenstrom R, Grafstein EJ, Innes GD, Christenson JM. The predictive validity of the Canadian triage and acuity scale (CTAS). Academic Emergency Medicine. 2003;10:512
27. Twomey M, Wallis LA, Myers JE. Limitations in validating emergency department triage scales. Emergency Medicine Journal. 2007;24:477–479
28. Versloot S-M, Luitse J. The agreement of the Manchester triage system and emergency severity index in terms of agreement: a comparison. Academic Emergency Medicine. 2007;14:57
29. Widfeldt N. Arbetsmaterial: Svensk översättning av Manchester Triage Flödesschema. Göteborg: Prehospitalt och Katastrofmedicinskt centrum; 2005;
30. Worster A, Gilboy N, Fernandes C, Eitel D, Kevin E, Geisler R. Assessment of inter-observer reliability of two five-level triage and acuity scales: a randomized controlled trial. Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2004;6:240–245