Review
Patient and caregiver expectations of emergency department care: A scoping literature review

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ienj.2016.07.001Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Literature related to patient and caregiver ED expectations is discussed.

  • Paucity of research literature related to patient/caregiver expectations.

  • Majority of studies do not communicate expectations to nurses or other health care providers.

  • Experimental research needed to evaluate strategies for obtaining ED expectations.

Abstract

Background

Communication between health care providers (HCPs) and patients and/or their caregivers in the chaotic emergency department (ED) context can be challenging and potentially impact health outcomes and patient satisfaction. Studies examining strategies to improve communication of patient and caregivers expectations of care in an ED are widely dispersed.

Methods

We conducted a scoping review of the published and grey literature to examine the extent, range and nature of existing research evidence regarding strategies to enhance communication of patient and caregiver expectations of care in an ED.

Results

Of the 599 articles retrieved, 24 met the inclusion criteria. Most of the studies identified included patients (n = 9) or caregivers (n = 8) as the population of interest, while the remainder examined the expectations of a mix of patients, parents/caregivers, and/or HCPs (n = 7). The majority (n = 21) of the studies did not communicate patient/caregiver expectations to HCPs.

Conclusion

This scoping review highlights the paucity of available research literature evaluating strategies to communicate patient and caregiver ED expectations. Our findings identify the need for experimental designs in future studies to evaluate implementation strategies for ED expectation tools with a particular emphasis on measuring the impact of sharing patient expectations with HCPs.

Introduction

The emergency department (ED) can be a chaotic environment characterized by frequent interruptions in important communication between patients and nurses and other health care providers (Dean and Oetzel, 2014). Previous research has shown that effective communication between health care providers and patients can improve patient satisfaction (Clever et al., 2008), while a failure in communication may result in adverse events and patient harm (Committee on Pediatric Emergency Medicine et al., 2010, Lingard et al., 2004). In a pediatric ED context, parents identify good communication as a vital element of quality care (Byczkowski et al., 2013). Furthermore, a child’s active involvement in their care in the ED also important (Hemingway and Redsell, 2011). Interventions that improve a patient-centred approach to care can improve quality in an ED (Dahl et al., 2015, Hoppa and Porter, 2011).

Patient-centred care is defined by the active involvement of patients and their families or caregivers (parents of pediatric patients) in their care including participation in decision-making about management and treatment options (Gill, 2013). Patient-centred care entails attending to patients’ preferences, needs and expectations for care and is central in the delivery of quality care (American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Pediatric Emergency, 2006, Hoppa and Porter, 2011). However, communication of patient preferences and expectations is a dimension of patient-centred care that can be compromised in a stressful ED environment (Kilaru et al., 2016). Opportunities to enhance the communication of patient expectations for care in an ED are not well understood.

Patients and caregivers come to the ED with expectations about the care and the services they will receive. Unmet expectations can have a negative impact on patient satisfaction and possibly influence return for follow-up care. Understanding and addressing patient and caregiver expectations during a clinical encounter in the ED can be challenging amid competing priorities. However, there is an increasing body of literature focused on determining the value of obtaining patient expectations in a written format prior to receiving care in the ED. For example, in a pediatric emergency care setting, studies have shown that obtaining caregiver expectations leads to improved communication and overall satisfaction with care (Spahr et al., 2006). The ‘Clear and Concise Communication Campaign’ or ‘3C Campaign”, a quality improvement (QI) initiative to share parents’/caregivers’ worries, questions, and expectations for care with health care providers in an urban Canadian pediatric ED, was also successful in improving parent-provider communication (Porter et al., 2011). Obtaining patient/caregiver expectations early in the patient encounter has been shown to provide an opportunity to create a mutually agreed upon agenda for discussing patient problems and expectations of care (Hoppa and Porter, 2011). To date, the literature examining patient and caregiver expectations of the ED has not been systematically reviewed. It is unclear how this body of literature is positioned in the field of emergency medicine and how ED expectations are defined and measured. As such, this scoping review will address the following research objectives: 1. To describe the extent, range and nature of current research evidence related to patient and caregiver ED expectations, 2. To describe the tools and measures used to capture patient and caregiver ED expectations and 3. To identify the quality of available evidence.

Section snippets

Methods

Scoping reviews “provide a rigorous and transparent method for mapping areas of research” (Pham et al., 2014). Unlike a traditional systematic review, a scoping review encompasses a broad focus to gain a sense of the breadth of available information from relevant literature (Arksey and O’Malley, 2005). The review team included clinicians with expertise in emergency medicine and evidence synthesis. We followed the five-stage framework outlined by Arksey and O’Malley (2005) to review the existing

Results

Of the 607 articles retrieved from the database search, 27 were duplicates. From the additional search strategies that were employed, six more articles were retrieved. This initial screening yielded 61 articles. A second stage of screening was conducted with the full-text articles, with a total of 24 articles satisfying inclusion criteria (Fig. 1). From the 24 articles included for review, all were published between 2000 and 2014, with the majority of articles (n = 10) published between 2003 and

Discussion

The purpose of a scoping review is to describe the breadth of available literature related to a specific research topic and identify the existing gaps. Findings from this review suggest there is a paucity of published research related to the measurement of patient and caregiver ED expectations and what is available is highly heterogeneous. The studies included in this review reflect the wide range of study designs and strategies used to measure patient and caregiver ED expectations and its

Limitations

This review used rigorous and transparent methods guided by Arksey and O’Malley’s scoping review methodology (Arksey and O’Malley, 2005). To ensure a broad search of the ED expectation literature, the search strategy included three electronic databases, hand-searching of six relevant emergency medicine journals, two registered trial protocol websites, and three grey literature sources. Two independent reviewers reviewed each title, abstract, and article. Reviewers met after each stage of

Conclusion

This scoping literature review describes current research activity in the area of patient and caregiver expectations in the ED. From the few articles that are published, there is a dominance of cross-sectional research studies that administer written surveys to patients and caregivers in the waiting room. The majority of the research on ED expectations explores its positive relationship with patient satisfaction, provider-patient-caregiver communication, and overall patient care. However, few

Financial support

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References (48)

  • S. Woolfenden et al.

    Parental use of a paediatric emergency department as an ambulatory care service

    Aust. N. Z. J. Public Health

    (2000)
  • A.M. Yee et al.

    What patients with abdominal pain expect about pain relief in the emergency department

    J. Emerg. Nurs.

    (2006)
  • American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Pediatric Emergency Medicine, American College of Emergency Physicians Pediatric Emergency Medicine Committee et al.

    Patient- and family-centered care and the role of the emergency physician providing care to a child in the emergency department

    Pediatrics

    (2006)
  • H. Arksey et al.

    Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework

    Int. J. Soc. Res. Methodol.

    (2005)
  • L.L. Carpenter et al.

    Service expectations and clinical characteristics of patients receiving psychiatric emergency services

    Psychiatr. Serv.

    (2005)
  • S.L. Clever et al.

    Does doctor–patient communication affect patient satisfaction with hospital care? Results of an analysis with a novel instrumental variable

    Health Serv. Res.

    (2008)
  • P. Cloutier et al.

    Pediatric mental health concerns in the emergency department: caregiver and youth perceptions and expectations

    Pediatr. Emerg. Care

    (2010)
  • Committee on Pediatric Emergency Medicine, American Academy of Pediatrics et al.

    Patient safety in the pediatric emergency care setting

    Pediatrics

    (2010)
  • T. Cooke et al.

    Patient expectations of emergency department care: phase II–a cross-sectional survey

    Can. J. Emerg. Med.

    (2006)
  • C. Cooper et al.

    The district hospital emergency department: why do parents present?

    Emerg. Med.

    (2003)
  • A. Dahl et al.

    Assessing physician-parent communication during emergency medical procedures in children: an observational study in a low-literacy Latino patient population

    Pediatr. Emerg. Care

    (2015)
  • M. Dean et al.

    Physicians’ perspectives of managing tensions around dimensions of effective communication in the emergency department

    Health Commun.

    (2014)
  • C. Elmqvist et al.

    On a hidden game board: the patient’s first encounter with emergency care at the emergency department

    J. Clin. Nurs.

    (2012)
  • M.C. Enarson et al.

    Beliefs and expectations of Canadian parents who bring febrile children for medical care

    Pediatrics

    (2012)
  • Cited by (12)

    • Predictors of Emergency Department service outcome for people brought in by police: A retrospective cohort study

      2022, International Emergency Nursing
      Citation Excerpt :

      People BIBP are a vulnerable population because of various reasons including high levels of comorbidity, homelessness and substance misuse [5]. Additionally, the chaotic and fragmented context of the ED [6] and a loss of autonomy from being detained contribute to additional vulnerability [7], highlighting a need for increased understanding of people BIBP. A review of 20 studies from seven countries revealed that people BIBP tend to be young and male [8].

    • Improving Emergency Care for Children With Medical Complexity: Parent and Physicians’ Perspectives

      2021, Academic Pediatrics
      Citation Excerpt :

      In addition, an aspect of communication that was evident to the study team was that parents of CMC had expectations for emergency care in the ED that were discordant with the systems that are currently available. Challenges with managing and providing appropriate parental and patient expectations in the pediatric ED have been described,28–30 but strategies to manage expectations in general are lacking.31 CMC bring added layers of complexity to the task of managing expectations above and beyond that of other children.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text