The helicopter as a caring context: Experiences of people suffering trauma

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ienj.2016.09.006Get rights and content

Highlights

  • The mixed feelings of shock and curiosity related to being in a helicopter.

  • The caregivers in HEMS provided comfort by showing consideration and being present.

  • HEMS were highly valued and seen as the ‘best way’ to get to a hospital.

Abstract

Introduction

When emergency medical services (EMS) are needed, the choice of transport depends on several factors. These may include the patient’s medical condition, transport accessibility to the accident site and the receiving hospital’s resources. Emergency care research is advancing, but little is known about the patient’s perspective of helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS).

Aim

The aim of this study was to describe trauma patients’ experiences of HEMS.

Method

Thirteen persons (ages 21–76) were interviewed using an interview guide. Data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis.

Findings

The analysis resulted in three themes: Being distraught and dazed by the event – patients experienced shock and tension, as well as feelings of curiosity and excitement. Being comforted by the caregivers – as the caregivers were present and attentive, they had no need for relatives in the helicopter. Being safe in a restricted environment – the participants’ injuries were taken seriously and the caregivers displayed effective teamwork.

Conclusion

For trauma patients to be taken seriously and treated as ‘worst cases’ enables them to trust their caregivers and ‘hand themselves over’ to their care. HEMS provide additional advantageous circumstances, such as being the sole patient and having proximity to a small, professional team.

Introduction

Suffering a trauma results in a sudden change to one’s everyday life and, initially, not knowing the extent of one’s injuries [21]. Injury due to trauma may require emergency medical services (EMS) to assist in transferring the victim from the pre-hospital location to a hospital, as he or she may require specialist care and specific medical technology [7]. EMS-assisted transfers are done mostly with help from ground ambulances [34], but centralization of highly specialized care is expected to increase the need for airborne transport [33]. However, patients’ experiences of helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS) are rarely studied.

Section snippets

Background

Sweden has approximately 700 ground ambulances [31] and 9 ambulance helicopters [30]. There are three priority levels for alerting EMS: acute life-threatening symptoms or an accident; urgent but not life-threatening symptoms; other assignments for care or supervision needs where a reasonable period is not expected to affect a patient’s condition [32]. Choice of transport and destination are decided based on a patient’s status, the receiving hospital’s clinical capabilities, transfer time from

Design

We used a qualitative approach aimed to provide an in-depth, holistic and contextual understanding (cf. [24]) of trauma patients’ experiences of HEMS. The participants were purposely selected and data collected by means of individual interviews with open-ended questions (cf. [24]).

Procedure

The inclusion criteria were: over 18 years of age, having suffered a trauma (defined as unintended physical injury) and having received primary transport from the accident scene to a hospital by HEMS. The trauma should

Findings

The analysis resulted in three themes describing the meanings of trauma patients’ experiences of HEMS. When the trauma happened, some participants realized its seriousness and described a fear of dying and struggling to stay alive. Others described that they realized they were injured, but were unsure about how serious it was and felt embarrassed about calling EMS, not knowing if it was necessary. Table 2 shows a schematic overview of the analysis. A description of each theme is presented under

Discussion

The aim of this study was to describe trauma patients’ experiences of HEMS. The findings showed that the participants found it difficult to assess and realize the seriousness of their injuries. The use of HEMS indicated that, in fact, they were serious, and that made participants somewhat frightened about the extent of their injuries. At the same time, the participants were appreciative of HEMS, as healthcare staff took the situation seriously.

The findings also show that, in their encounters

Conclusions

Patients who suffer traumatic injuries are in a vulnerable situation, shocked by their sudden injury and unsure of it severity. HEMS are viewed as serious responses taken by EMS, as the patients experience it as the ‘best way to get to a hospital’. Being taken seriously lays the foundation for patients to be able to trust in caregivers. HEMS provide advantageous circumstances for a positive caring environment, such as often being the sole patient to care for, having close proximity during

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding.

Conflict of interests

The authors declare there is no conflict of interest.

Author contributions

Study design: LS, ÅE, CN, PJ. Data collection: LS. Data analysis: LS, ÅE, CN, PJ. Manuscript preparation: LS, ÅE, CN, PJ.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the participants for sharing their experiences.

References (38)

  • M. Nyström et al.

    Non-caring encounters at an emergency care unit–a life-world hermeneutic analysis of an efficiency-driven organization

    Int J Nurs Stud

    (2003)
  • J.A. O’Brien et al.

    The experience of trauma resuscitation in the emergency department: themes from seven patients

    J Emerg Nurs

    (2004)
  • R. Semonin-Holleran

    Flight nursing: providing patient care during air transport

    Accid Emerg Nurs

    (1994)
  • J. Vesterbacka et al.

    A rural ambulance helicopter system in northern Sweden

    Air Med J

    (2001)
  • L.D. Wigman et al.

    Trauma-related dispatch criteria for helicopter emergency medical services in Europe

    Injury

    (2011)
  • E. Wiman et al.

    Trauma patients’ encounters with the team in the emergency department—a qualitative study

    Int J Nurs Stud

    (2007)
  • M.R. Zarei et al.

    Modern concepts of transport in multiple trauma: a narrative review

    Chin J Traumatol

    (2013)
  • B.E. Bledsoe et al.

    Helicopter scene transport of trauma patients with non-life-threatening injuries: a meta-analysis

    J Trauma Acute Surg

    (2006)
  • M.A. Diaz et al.

    When is the helicopter faster? A comparison of helicopter and ground ambulance transport times

    J Trauma Acute Care Surg

    (2005)
  • Cited by (8)

    • In safe hands: Patients’ experiences of intrahospital transport during intensive care

      2020, Intensive and Critical Care Nursing
      Citation Excerpt :

      Another possible explanation might be that patient’s entrusted themselves to the ICU staff, feeling confident that they would protect them if needed. Similar to our findings, a study exploring trauma patients experiences of helicopter transfers showed that the patients trusted the caregivers and handed themselves over to their care (Sandstrom et al., 2017). However, findings from a study exploring the patient’s situation during interhospital transfers between ICUs suggests that patients were at risk of objectification since healthcare professionals needed to prioritise patient safety during a challenging care situation (i.e. maintain intensive care during the transport) (Karlsson et al., 2019).

    • Experiences of suffering multiple trauma: A qualitative study

      2019, Intensive and Critical Care Nursing
      Citation Excerpt :

      In summary, research demonstrates that recovery after trauma is complex and that it is important to minimise the risk for psychological and emotional distress and to ensure an optimal trauma care continuum for those who have suffered an accident. Several previous studies focus on the initial trauma treatment and nursing care (Granstrom et al., 2018; Morse and Proctor, 1998; Sandström et al., 2017). Increased knowledge of the way patients handle their recovery process is important in order to strengthen nurses’ and other healthcare professional’s ability to anticipate and address patients’ needs and resources.

    • Patient experiences of initial trauma care

      2019, International Emergency Nursing
      Citation Excerpt :

      These differences in goals might be overcome if the trauma team members keep a person-centred focus during the whole trauma assessment. A previous study showed that more seriously injured patients rated their care higher compared to patients with minor injuries, and less seriously injured patients were less satisfied with the communication with trauma team members [26]. In this study, most patients were over-triaged (with an ISS below 15) and could have benefitted from a less active care since they were not seriously injured.

    • Altruism in Paramedicine: A Scoping Review

      2022, Healthcare (Switzerland)
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text